Resilient Civil Infrastructure Design against Earthquake and Flood Risks Under Climate Change

Authors

  • Abdul Qadoos Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63544/pttjmt35

Keywords:

Civil Infrastructure, Structural Resilience, Earthquake Risk, Flood Risk, Climate Change, Multi-Hazard Assessment, Climate Adaptation, Sustainable Infrastructure

Abstract

The civil infrastructure is becoming more and more prone to earthquake and flood hazards whereas climate change is adding another level of uncertainty for infrastructure designs, structural performance, and sustainability. This research work attempts to explore resilient civil infrastructure designs under earthquake and flood hazards and changing climatic conditions, which include topics related to structural vulnerability, multi-hazard assessment, climate adaptation, and sustainable engineering practices. Qualitative, descriptive, and literature review methodology has been used for this research work by examining nine academic articles that have been published from 2022 to 2025. The selected literature revolves around underground infrastructure, coastal resilience, road network, reinforced concrete bridge, flood adaptation, and disaster management. From the descriptive analysis, it has been found that four out of nine articles (44.44%) mainly concentrate on multi-hazard and resilience of the infrastructure. In addition, six of the articles (66.67%) were published between 2024 and 2025, indicating that there is a focus in the chosen literature on infrastructure resilience and risks associated with climate change. In terms of implications, the results indicate the need to incorporate seismic resistant building structures, adaptive constructions regarding floods, climate responsive asset management, and hazard assessment at the network level into infrastructure planning. In addition, the analysis suggests that resilience of infrastructure should be based on structural integrity, functionality, readiness of an organization, and capacity to restore the infrastructure after hazardous events occur. At the same time, the chosen literature lacks common quantitative measures that would help to evaluate any improvements of structural performance or savings achieved through the use of infrastructure. The conclusion is that the framework of multi-hazard planning may be used to create a concept of safe infrastructure.

REFERENCES

[1] A. M. Imran, “Resilience in civil infrastructure: Designing for natural disasters,” Khwarizmia, vol. 2023, pp. 138–145, 2023.

[2] C. B. Avcı and M. Vanolya, “Proposed framework for sustainable flood risk-based design, construction and rehabilitation of culverts and bridges under climate change,” Water, vol. 17, no. 11, Art. no. 1663, 2025.

[3] D. C. Feng, J. Y. Ding, S. C. Xie, Y. Li, M. Akiyama, Y. Lu, et al., “Climate change impacts on the risk assessment of concrete civil infrastructures,” ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 03124001, 2024.

[4] M. M. Islam, M. A. H. Arif, A. H. Hussain, S. M. S. Raihena, M. Rashaq, and Q. R. Mariam, “Human-centered AI for workforce and health integration: Advancing trustworthy clinical decisions,” Journal of Neonatal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2023.

[5] K. C. Goh, T. A. Kurniawan, H. H. Goh, D. Zhang, M. Jiang, W. Dai, et al., “Strengthening infrastructure resilience for climate change mitigation: Case studies from the Southeast Asia region with a focus on wastewater treatment plants in addressing flooding challenges,” ACS ES&T Water, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3725–3740, 2024.

[6] M. Chaudhari, “Epoxy barrier coatings reinforced with solidified-waste microfillers for aggressive acids,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 25, no. 3, Art. no. 3020, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.4238/96y1s945.

[7] M. T. U. Alam, M. N. Azam, S. S. Raihena, M. Al-Imran, M. S. Chowdhury, and A. S. Mozomder, “Predicting donor churn and customer sentiment from reviews using logistic regression and NLP: A data-driven approach to retention and sentiment analysis,” Journal of Business and Management Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 340–350, 2025.

[8] M. Akiyama, “Life-cycle approaches to sustainable and resilient infrastructure: Innovations in multi-hazard frameworks,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 21, nos. 11–12, pp. 1756–1781, 2025.

[9] M. A. Jawed, “Uncertainty-aware geostatistical reconstruction of regional groundwater hydraulics under sparse monitoring conditions: A case study of the Evergreen Underground Water Conservation District (EUWCD), Texas, USA,” Bishop International Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 2025.

[10] M. A. Jawed, “Managed aquifer recharge with advanced treated municipal effluent: Modelling the impact on groundwater chemistry and native microbial ecology,” International Journal of Research & Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 128–138, 2024.

[11] R. Singh, “Bench-scale nanomedicine preparation methods are poorly predictive of scalable manufacturing outcomes: A comparative lab study of liposomal doxorubicin,” Genetics and Molecular Research, Sep. 23, 2026, doi: 10.4238/3j98x660.

[12] H. Huang, D. Zhang, and Z. Huang, “Resilience of city underground infrastructure under multi-hazards impact: From structural level to network level,” Resilient Cities and Structures, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 76–86, 2022.

[13] M. S. Uddin, A. Khan, I. Alim, and D. Khan, “The evolution of cybersecurity in the digital age: Contemporary threats, technologies, and future directions,” Journal of Computational Systems & Engineering Insights, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 12–29, 2026.

[14] R. Singh, “Pharmacognosy-to-candidate: Protease-directed prioritization of plant-derived glycosides via minimal semi-synthetic optimization,” International Journal of Clinical Research and Medical Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, 2026.

[15] R. Bhattacharya, J. Mukherjee, S. Roy, M. T. Rana, and R. Parveen, “Eco-crypto dynamics: Cointegration of green and non-green cryptocurrencies for sustainable investing,” Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 2, no. 3, 2025.

[16] S. Mannucci, F. Rosso, A. D’Amico, G. Bernardini, and M. Morganti, “Flood resilience and adaptation in the built environment: How far along are we?” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, Art. no. 4096, 2022.

[17] M. A. U. H. Khan, R. Parveen, I. Ahmed, M. H. Milon, and T. A. Khan, “High-accuracy breast cancer diagnosis using neural networks and dimensionality reduction techniques,” in Proc. IEEE 19th Int. Conf. Open Source Syst. Technol. (ICOSST), Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 2025, pp. 1–6.

[18] M. Chaudhari, “Defect-sparse 2D carbon in epoxy powder coatings: Pore control and EIS durability,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 25, no. 3, Art. no. 3019, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.4238/sf39b924.

[19] A. Oğuz, “A multi-hazard, performance-centered framework for climate-resilient construction management,” International Reviews, Research, and Studies in Civil Engineering, pp. 1–24, 2025.

[20] K. S. Sreekeshava, S. Kolathayar, and N. V. C. Menon, “Civil engineering for multi-hazard risk reduction—An introduction,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Interdisciplinary Approaches in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, Jul. 2023, pp. 1–10.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2026

How to Cite

Resilient Civil Infrastructure Design against Earthquake and Flood Risks Under Climate Change. (2026). Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 4(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.63544/pttjmt35

Share

Similar Articles

11-20 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.